<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>On the Move &#187; pedestrians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onthemoveblog.com/tag/pedestrians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com</link>
	<description>Tales and thoughts about getting around and other stuff worth mentioning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:39:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jaywalkers beware!</title>
		<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/jaywalkers-beware/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=jaywalkers-beware</link>
		<comments>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/jaywalkers-beware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laws and policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jaywalking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedestrian crossing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedestrians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthemoveblog.com/?p=4819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First it was Windcrest.  Now it seems that SAPD is also cracking down on jaywalkers. Earlier this year, reports surfaced that Windcrest police were ticketing Rackspace employees who were on their way to or from lunch at one of the restaurants across Walzem Road from Rackspace&#8217;s headquarters at the old Windsor Park Mall, known affectionately [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.boston.com"><img title="No jaywalking sign" src="http://www.boston.com/news/local/startsandstops/blog/41-jaywalking.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(Image from Boston.com/The Boston Globe)</p></div>
<p>First it was Windcrest.  Now it seems that SAPD is also cracking down on jaywalkers.</p>
<p>Earlier this year, <a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_news/windcrest_police_take_on_rackspace_jaywalkers_97447599.html" target="_blank">reports</a> surfaced that Windcrest police were ticketing Rackspace employees who were on their way to or from lunch at one of the restaurants across Walzem Road from Rackspace&#8217;s headquarters at the old Windsor Park Mall, known affectionately as &#8220;The Castle&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now, there are several anecdotal reports of this happening in San Antonio itself, <a href="http://community.artofmanliness.com/forum/topics/jaywalking-ticket-for-my-teen" target="_blank">first at a school</a>, now at <a href="http://www.city-data.com/forum/san-antonio/1116291-i-got-my-first-jaywalking-ticket.html" target="_blank">some other location</a> (it might even be the airport based on the person&#8217;s description of the sign, which I have only seen at the airport.)</p>
<p>So this begs the question, what are the state and local laws regarding jaywalking? <span id="more-4819"></span> Here is the state law:</p>
<blockquote><p>Sec. 552.005.  CROSSING AT POINT OTHER THAN CROSSWALK.  (a)  A pedestrian shall yield the right-of-way to a vehicle on the highway if crossing a roadway at a place:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(1)  other than in a marked crosswalk or in an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection; or</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(2)  where a pedestrian tunnel or overhead pedestrian crossing has been provided.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #800000;">(b)  Between adjacent intersections at which traffic control signals are in operation, a pedestrian may cross only in a marked crosswalk.</span></strong></p>
<p>(c)  A pedestrian may cross a roadway intersection diagonally only if and in the manner authorized by a traffic control device.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/TN/htm/TN.552.htm#552.005" target="_blank">Source</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>By the way, in the transportation code, the term &#8220;highway&#8221; means any public roadway.</p>
<p>Therefore, if the nearest two intersections to your location have traffic signals, you have to use a marked crosswalk.  This would mostly apply in the downtown area as most suburban arterials don&#8217;t have signals at every intersection.</p>
<p>The local ordinance is a little more restrictive:<span id="PTIICO_CH19MOVETR_ARTIIITRNTDE_S19-80PEWADOTWAWASILI">  </span></p>
<blockquote><p>Sec. 19-80. &#8211; Pedestrian &#8220;walk,&#8221; &#8220;don&#8217;t walk&#8221; and &#8220;wait&#8221; signal lights.</p>
<p>(a) Whenever special pedestrian control signals exhibiting the words &#8220;walk,&#8221; &#8220;wait&#8221; or &#8220;don&#8217;t walk&#8221; are in place, such signals shall indicate as follows:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(1) <em>&#8220;Walk.&#8221;</em> Pedestrians facing such signals may proceed across the street in the direction of the signal and shall be given the right-of-way by drivers of all vehicles.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(2) <em>&#8220;Don&#8217;t Walk,&#8221;</em> <em>or &#8220;Wait.&#8221;</em> No pedestrians shall start to cross the street in the direction of the signal, but any pedestrian who has partially completed his crossing on the &#8220;walk&#8221; signal shall proceed to a sidewalk or safety island while the &#8220;don&#8217;t walk&#8221; or &#8220;wait&#8221; signal is showing.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #800000;">(b) No pedestrian shall cross a roadway other than in a crosswalk in any business district.</span></strong></p>
<p><span id="PTIICO_CH19MOVETR_ARTIIITRNTDE_S19-80PEWADOTWAWASILI">(<a href="http://library.municode.com/HTML/11508/level3/PTIICO_CH19MOVETR_ARTIIITRNTDE.html#PTIICO_CH19MOVETR_ARTIIITRNTDE_S19-80PEWADOTWAWASILI" target="_blank">Source</a>)</span></p></blockquote>
<div><span id="PTIICO_CH19MOVETR_ARTIIITRNTDE_S19-80PEWADOTWAWASILI">However, the code does not define what constitutes a &#8220;business district&#8221;, so we&#8217;re left to determine that on our own.  A good measure might again be the state Transportation Code&#8217;s definition:</span></div>
<div>
<blockquote>
<div><span id="PTIICO_CH19MOVETR_ARTIIITRNTDE_S19-80PEWADOTWAWASILI"><span id="PTIICO_CH19MOVETR_ARTIIITRNTDE_S19-80PEWADOTWAWASILI">Sec. 541.102.  RESTRICTED DISTRICTS.  In this subtitle:</span></span></div>
<p>(1)  &#8221;Business district&#8221; means the territory adjacent to and including a highway if buildings used for business or industrial purposes, including a building used as a hotel, bank, office building, public building, or railroad station:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(A)  are located within a 600-foot segment along the highway; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(B)  within that segment the buildings occupy at least 300 feet of frontage:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(i)  on one side of the highway; or</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(ii)  collectively on both sides of the highway.</p>
<p> (<a href="http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/TN/htm/TN.541.htm#541.102" target="_blank">Source</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>So the upshot is probably this&#8211; unless you&#8217;re on a residential street, it&#8217;s probably a good idea&#8211; both for your safety as well as to avoid getting a ticket&#8211; to cross in a marked crosswalk or at a signalized intersection.  The current fine in San Antonio for jaywalking: <strong>$162.10</strong>.  I don&#8217;t know about you, but that&#8217;s enough for me to walk to the corner.</div>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onthemoveblog.com%2Fjaywalkers-beware%2F&amp;title=Jaywalkers%20beware%21" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.onthemoveblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/jaywalkers-beware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walking in San Antonio not as dangerous</title>
		<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/walking-in-san-antonio-not-as-dangerous/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=walking-in-san-antonio-not-as-dangerous</link>
		<comments>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/walking-in-san-antonio-not-as-dangerous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commuting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedestrians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidewalks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthemoveblog.com/?p=966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Transportation For America and the Surface Transportation Policy Partnership released a report called Dangerous By Design that exposes what most of us here in San Antonio know all too well&#8211; that being a pedestrian on local streets can be a dangerous proposition.  However, compared to the other three big Texas metros&#8211; and most other metros nationally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.indystar.com/starwatch/2009/11/"><img class="size-full wp-image-967 alignright" title="Where the sidewalk ends" src="http://www.onthemoveblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/sidewalk.jpg" alt="Where the sidewalk ends" width="299" height="240" /></a>Last week, Transportation For America and the Surface Transportation Policy Partnership released a report called <a title="Dangerous by Design: Solving the Epidemic of Preventable Pedestrian Deaths (and Making Great Neighborhoods)" href="http://t4america.org/resources/dangerousbydesign/" target="_blank">Dangerous By Design</a> that exposes what most of us here in San Antonio know all too well&#8211; that being a pedestrian on local streets can be a dangerous proposition.  However, compared to the other three big Texas metros&#8211; and most other metros nationally for that matter&#8211; San Antonio is not too bad.</p>
<p><span id="more-966"></span>According to the report, San Antonio ranked 30th out of the 52 metros with 1 million or more people (1st place was the most dangerous) with an average pedestrian fatality rate of 1.39 deaths per 100,000 residents in 2007-2008.  Houston was 8th, DFW 13th, and even Austin, which prides itself on its pedestrian amenities, ranked 19th.  Even more interesting was that San Antonio&#8217;s percentage of commuters who walk was 2.4%, compared to Austin&#8217;s 2.1% (those figures are from the 2000 Census.)</p>
<p>Of course, there&#8217;s definitely room for improvement.  San Antonians know that there are lots of &#8220;sidewalks to nowhere&#8221;, broken and obstructed walkways, and many streets with no sidewalks at all.  Fortunately, local transportation planners got the message a while ago and new projects now have pedestrian and bicycle facilities included, and retrofitting and repairing older facilities is an ongoing endeavor.</p>
<p>The top four most dangerous places to be a pedestrian were all in Florida: Orlando, Tampa, Miami, and Jacksonville were one through four respectively.  The safest places?  Minneapolis, Boston, and New York.</p>
<p>You can read the full report <a href="http://t4america.org/resources/dangerousbydesign/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onthemoveblog.com%2Fwalking-in-san-antonio-not-as-dangerous%2F&amp;title=Walking%20in%20San%20Antonio%20not%20as%20dangerous" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://www.onthemoveblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/walking-in-san-antonio-not-as-dangerous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

