<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>On the Move</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onthemoveblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com</link>
	<description>Tales and thoughts about getting around and other stuff worth mentioning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:47:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Most congested roads in San Antonio</title>
		<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/09/most-congested-roads-in-san-antonio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/09/most-congested-roads-in-san-antonio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basse Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Castroville Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culebra Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fredericksburg Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loop 1604]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nacogdoches Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Department of Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US 281]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wurzbach Road]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthemoveblog.com/?p=4375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
TxDOT released their second annual list of the 100 most congested roadway segments in the state.  Last year&#8217;s list inexplicably missed US 281 north of Loop 1604, but not this year.  However, it still wasn&#8217;t tops in Bexar County.  Loop 1604 West, from Bandera to Culebra, ranked #1 in Bexar County and #23 in the state [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4383" title="Most congested road segments in Bexar County" src="http://www.onthemoveblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/list1.jpg" alt="Most congested road segments in Bexar County" width="500" height="335" /></p>
<p>TxDOT released their second annual list of the 100 most congested roadway segments in the state.  Last year&#8217;s list inexplicably missed US 281 north of Loop 1604, but not this year.  However, it still wasn&#8217;t tops in Bexar County.  <span id="more-4375"></span>Loop 1604 West, from Bandera to Culebra, ranked #1 in Bexar County and #23 in the state with 945,701 annual hours of delay, or about 197,000 hours per mile, costing commuters $20.6 million.  A rush hour trip on that section of 1604 took 51% longer than an off-peak trip, according to the data.</p>
<p>Second in Bexar County was the infamous stretch of US 281 from Loop 1604 to the Comal County line.  It ranked 38th statewide with 1.2 million hours of annual delay costing commuters $25.7 million.  These numbers are larger than those for 1604, but because the congestion levels drop-off substantially north of Marshall, that only worked-out to about 150,000 hours of delay per mile for the entire segment, which was the metric on which the rankings were based.  US 281 also had a lower ratio of peak-period to off-peak congestion: a rush hour journey only took 33% longer.  There are two ways to interpret that stat: either rush hour traffic isn&#8217;t really bad, or even non-rush hour traffic is pretty lousy.  I think we all know which of those two applies to 281.</p>
<p>Bexar County had 11 segments on this year&#8217;s list (state rankings in parenthesis):</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>1 (23):</strong> Loop 1604, Bandera to Culebra</li>
<li><strong>2 (38):</strong> US 281, Loop 1604 to Comal County Line</li>
<li><strong>3 (48):</strong> I-35, US 281 to US 90</li>
<li><strong>4 (49):</strong> I-35, Loop 1604 to Guadalupe County Line</li>
<li><strong>5 (50):</strong> Culebra Rd., Loop 410 to Grissom</li>
<li><strong>6 (56):</strong> Wurzbach Rd., NW Military to Loop 410</li>
<li><strong>7 (62):</strong> I-35 North, Loop 410 to Loop 1604</li>
<li><strong>8 (75):</strong> Castroville Rd., SW 19th to SH 151</li>
<li><strong>9 (81):</strong> Fredericksburg Rd., Woodlawn to Loop 410</li>
<li><strong>10 (94):</strong> Loop 410 North, I-35 to US 281</li>
<li><strong>11 (96):</strong> Basse Rd./Nacogdoches Rd., US 281 to Naco-Perrin</li>
</ul>
<p>Some on the list are surprising, such as Castroville Rd.  But overall, this list is probably more spot-on than last year&#8217;s.  This is probably because TxDOT used a new methodology this year to compile the list.  You can read all the gory details about their process <a href="http://apps.dot.state.tx.us/apps/rider56/RegionalMaps/howTheSegmentsWereIdentified.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Bexar County ranked third in the number of segments on the list after Harris (35) and Dallas (24) Counties.  However, the DFW Metroplex had 37 roadways on the list, and the Austin area tied with San Antonio with 11.</p>
<p>You can see the entire list here:<br />
<a href="http://www.txdot.gov/news/038-2010.htm">http://www.txdot.gov/news/038-2010.htm</a></p>
<p>San Antonio Express-News story:<br />
<a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/traffic/bexar_county_roads_not_as_clogged_as_others_study_shows_102026673.html" target="_blank">MySanAntonio.com &#8211; S.A. traffic could be worse — no, really</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/09/most-congested-roads-in-san-antonio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-N rips AGUA</title>
		<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/e-n-rips-agua/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/e-n-rips-agua/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 03:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGUA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loop 1604]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US 281]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthemoveblog.com/?p=4370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you didn&#8217;t see it, the Express-News editorial board took AGUA to task today over their 281/1604 interchange lawsuit, calling the legal action &#8220;stunningly irresponsible&#8221; and saying that &#8220;(a)ny notion that (AUGA is) operating in good faith now lacks credibility.&#8221;  Furthemore, the editorial reveals some of the ludicrous demands made by AGUA.  Check it out:
http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/aguas_lawsuitclearly_misguided_101672858.html?showFullArticle=y
There&#8217;s also a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you didn&#8217;t see it, the Express-News editorial board took AGUA to task today over their 281/1604 interchange lawsuit, calling the legal action &#8220;stunningly irresponsible&#8221; and saying that &#8220;(a)ny notion that (AUGA is) operating in good faith now lacks credibility.&#8221;  Furthemore, the editorial reveals some of the ludicrous demands made by AGUA.  Check it out:<br />
<a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/aguas_lawsuitclearly_misguided_101672858.html?showFullArticle=y">http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/aguas_lawsuitclearly_misguided_101672858.html?showFullArticle=y</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a good John Branch cartoon:<br />
<a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/cartoonists/Latest_cartoons_from_John_Branch.html?c=n#1">http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/cartoonists/Latest_cartoons_from_John_Branch.html?c=n#1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/e-n-rips-agua/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eckhert, Braun improvements on tap this weekend</title>
		<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/eckhert-braun-improvements-on-tap-this-weekend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/eckhert-braun-improvements-on-tap-this-weekend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bandera Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Braun Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intersection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthemoveblog.com/?p=4365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As discussed previously, a second right-turn lane is being added to Eckhert at Bandera.  That work should be completed this weekend.
Also, the new westbound lane on Braun at Loop 1604 will also be striped and opened in time for Monday&#8217;s commute.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/relief-coming-for-eckhert-at-bandera/" target="_blank">discussed previously</a>, a second right-turn lane is being added to Eckhert at Bandera.  That work should be completed this weekend.</p>
<p>Also, the new <a href="http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/loop-1604braun-update/" target="_blank">westbound lane on Braun at Loop 1604</a> will also be striped and opened in time for Monday&#8217;s commute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/eckhert-braun-improvements-on-tap-this-weekend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heat already on AGUA?</title>
		<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/heat-already-on-agua/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/heat-already-on-agua/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGUA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loop 1604]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US 281]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthemoveblog.com/?p=4360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In reader comments posted yesterday in response to the Express-News&#8217; story about AGUA&#8217;s lawsuit to stop the US 281/Loop 1604 interchange, several posters were calling for boycotts of local businesses listed on AUGA&#8217;s &#8220;donors&#8221; page.  Today, that list of businesses is gone from AGUA&#8217;s site.  Reading between the lines, I think it&#8217;s pretty obvious that the heat is already on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reader comments posted yesterday in response to the <a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/traffic/lawsuit_could_delay_highway_interchange_101489984.html?c=y&amp;viewAllComments=y" target="_blank">Express-News&#8217; story</a> about AGUA&#8217;s lawsuit to stop the US 281/Loop 1604 interchange, several posters were calling for boycotts of local businesses listed on AUGA&#8217;s <a href="http://www.aquiferguardians.org/donors.htm" target="_blank">&#8220;donors&#8221; page</a>.  Today, that list of businesses is gone from AGUA&#8217;s site.  Reading between the lines, I think it&#8217;s pretty obvious that the heat is already on AGUA from their donors over their wildly unpopular and inane decision to sue.</p>
<p>What effect do you think this will have, if any?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/heat-already-on-agua/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First super-street intersection to open Monday</title>
		<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/first-super-street-intersection-to-open-monday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/first-super-street-intersection-to-open-monday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alamo Regional Mobility Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intersection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super-street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US 281]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthemoveblog.com/?p=4354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After yesterday&#8217;s disheartening news about the US 281/Loop 1604 interchange, I have a bit of good news today.  Earlier this week, the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority (ARMA) announced that the first intersection in the US 281 super-street project will be completed and open to traffic on Monday morning.
That intersection&#8211; at Encino Rio&#8211; will actually be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After yesterday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/agua-files-suit-to-stop-2811604-interchange/" target="_blank">disheartening news</a> about the US 281/Loop 1604 interchange, I have a bit of good news today.  Earlier this week, the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority (ARMA) announced that the first intersection in the US 281 super-street project will be completed and open to traffic on Monday morning.</p>
<p><span id="more-4354"></span>That intersection&#8211; at Encino Rio&#8211; will actually be different than the other intersections in the project in that traffic coming from Encino Rio will still be able to make the left turn onto 281.  In the other intersections (Evans, Stone Oak/TPC, and Marshall), traffic on those streets will have to turn right, then make a U-turn in order to turn left.  But at Encino Rio, since there&#8217;s very little traffic that makes the left turn onto Encino Rio from southbound 281 relative to traffic turning left from Encino Rio onto 281, it was decided to eliminate the left turns from 281 onto Encino Rio and into the Martin Marietta quarry and instead increase the left turn capacity from Encino Rio onto 281 southbound by adding a third left turn lane.  This combination of changes will provide the time-savings and signal phase reductions that will improve traffic flow on 281 itself.</p>
<p>However, this last dash to the finish line will have an appreciable pain factor&#8211; there will be major lane closures all weekend at Encino Rio as crews transform the intersection, finish the traffic signal installation, repave all the lanes, and mark them.  So I strongly advise everyone to avoid the area completely this weekend.</p>
<p>The remaining intersections will be completed in the same fashion one-at-a-time moving north (i.e. Evans is next) starting the weekend following Labor Day.  This means completion of the project, which is about a month behind schedule due to unusually heavy rains earlier this year, will be in late September.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/first-super-street-intersection-to-open-monday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AGUA files suit to stop 281/1604 interchange</title>
		<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/agua-files-suit-to-stop-2811604-interchange/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/agua-files-suit-to-stop-2811604-interchange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toll roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGUA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alamo Regional Mobility Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loop 1604]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US 281]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthemoveblog.com/?p=4340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what really isn&#8217;t a surprise (at least to me), the enviro-wackos at Aquifer Guardians in Urban Areas (AGUA) have filed a lawsuit seeking to stop the planned US 281/Loop 1604 interchange project, which would build the first four direct connectors at that intersection.  According to an early Express-News report, AGUA claims that the Alamo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what really isn&#8217;t a surprise (at least to me), the enviro-wackos at Aquifer Guardians in Urban Areas (AGUA) have filed a lawsuit seeking to stop the planned US 281/Loop 1604 interchange project, which would build the first four direct connectors at that intersection.  According to an early <a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/lawsuit_could_delay_highway_interchange_101489984.html" target="_blank">Express-News</a> report, AGUA claims that the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority (ARMA) didn&#8217;t kowtow to their demands, so they had no choice but to file a lawsuit.</p>
<p>Whatever. </p>
<p><span id="more-4340"></span>If you couldn&#8217;t tell, I think this is one of the more ridiculous chapters in the long-running saga of the US 281 story, a tale rife with zaniness.  This interchange project was environmentally-approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) using a Categorical Exclusion, which means that in the experience of highway agencies across the country, these types of improvements have not had any significant environmental impacts.  It got that approval for good reason.  Yes, the project location is in the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone, but it is wholly within the existing rights-of-way of 281 and 1604 (with the exception of a few small parcels of already-developed land at the corners of the intersection itself.)  Therefore, this project would not cause any additional environmental harm given what&#8217;s already there, and actually would help reduce air pollution and runoff pollution caused by oil and other contaminated drippings from vehicles idling at the existing intersection.  But AGUA doesn&#8217;t see that part apparently.</p>
<p>Instead, they compared it to the &#8220;loophole&#8221; that BP used to drill the now-infamous Deepwater Horizon well in the Gulf of Mexico.</p>
<p>Seriously?  They&#8217;re obviously drinking some funny Kool-Aid over at the AGUA treehouse.</p>
<p>I had hopes that the anti-toll folks that had partnered with AGUA previously to stop the planned US 281 toll road would pressure them to ease-off of a lawsuit against the interchange.  If (or probably when) AGUA loses this lawsuit, their credibility will be shot, not to mention the enormous public backlash that they are about to incur for this stunt, thus almost certainly crippling any of their future opposition efforts.</p>
<p>Toll opponents have been generally mum on the interchange project.  Initially they made some mild noise about the project&#8217;s extent and costs, but as of late, they really haven&#8217;t been heard from, probably because it was to be built toll-free and because they read the same tea leaves I did about the public wrath that they would suffer if they opposed this nearly universally popular project.  It&#8217;s the old pick-your-battles lesson.</p>
<p>Hopefully this lawsuit will be resolved quickly.  If not, the project could lose its stimulus funding, and then we&#8217;re back to square one.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll have more on this in the coming days.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/lawsuit_could_delay_highway_interchange_101489984.html" target="_blank">San Antonio Express-News (MySanAntonio.com) story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/agua-files-suit-to-stop-2811604-interchange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Live longer by driving less (or at least slower)</title>
		<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/live-longer-by-driving-less/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/live-longer-by-driving-less/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 02:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automobiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commuting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthemoveblog.com/?p=4270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent study laid out what I found to be an amazing stat.
For every hour driving, U.S. life expectancy decreases by 20 minutes, suggests analysis in a University of Toronto study. The shorter life spans are due to crashes.
An hour a day is about the average two-way San Antonio commute. So the typical driver here loses four days a year, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_4273" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 460px"><a href="http://www.viainfo.net/FaresAndPasses/CommuteCalculator.aspx" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-4273" title="San-Antonio-traffic-jam" src="http://www.onthemoveblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/San-Antonio-traffic-jam.jpg" alt="San Antonio traffic jam" width="450" height="236" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">San Antonio traffic jam photo from viainfo.net.</p></div>
<p>A recent study laid out what I found to be an amazing stat.</p>
<p>For every hour driving, U.S. life expectancy decreases by 20 minutes, suggests analysis in a <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20190187" target="_blank">University of Toronto study</a>. The shorter life spans are due to crashes.</p>
<p>An hour a day is about the average two-way San Antonio commute. So the typical driver here loses four days a year, about half a year over a 40-year career. The payoff is a year and a half slogging through traffic to make the bucks.</p>
<p>The finding that drivers lose a minute of life for every three minutes on the road wasn&#8217;t even the main point of the study. Authors wanted to consider the risks of driving faster to reduce travel times. They determined that time saved by speeding is far outweighed by shortened lives due to higher chances of crashing.</p>
<p>The conclusion: Americans drive a little too fast and can live longer by driving slower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/live-longer-by-driving-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Road trip to Midland and Odessa, Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/road-trip-to-midland-and-odessa-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/road-trip-to-midland-and-odessa-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 20:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthemoveblog.com/?p=4261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rolling forward on my 2010 resolution to get out of San Antonio more, I took a three day trip to Midland and Odessa, two cities, indeed a region of Texas, I had not visited before in the nineteen years I have called the Lone State home.  I set out on the last Thursday in July, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_4265" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-4265" title="polikarpov" src="http://www.onthemoveblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/polikarpov1-300x163.jpg" alt="Polikarpov I-16 at the CAF museum, Midland, Texas" width="300" height="163" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Polikarpov I-16 at the CAF museum, Midland, Texas</p></div>
<p>Rolling forward on my 2010 resolution to get out of San Antonio more, I took a three day trip to Midland and Odessa, two cities, indeed a region of Texas, I had not visited before in the nineteen years I have called the Lone State home.  I set out on the last Thursday in July, which proved to be a very good time to go.<span id="more-4261"></span></p>
<p>For whatever reason, HWY 87, the route I decided to take on the outward bound leg, was essentially empty north of Fredericksburg.  Even when I drove into San Angelo just after 5:00 PM, traffic on the road was very light.  It just seemed odd to traverse handsome county seats like Mason and only see one or two other moving vehicles.</p>
<p>Following a stroll around Fort Concho which closed just before I got there, I continued on towards Big Spring before getting onto I 20 heading west to Midland.  Traveling by myself, with just an ipod for company, the landscape became flatter and the wind grew stronger.  A veritable forest of massive electricity generating wind turbines dotted the landscape, harvesting the enormous amount of free energy that just about knocked me over when got out of the car for a moment.</p>
<p>The hotel I chose was inexpensive in every way, but you get what you pay for, so I have no complaints.  I spent the whole of Friday, which happened to be my birthday, driving around the sights of Midland and Odessa.  My first port of call was the Commemorative Air Force museum.  To my surprise and delight I pretty much the whole place to myself during my 2 ½ hour visit.  As most CAF aircraft are dispersed around the country in different locations, like the Douglas C-47 Skytrain I hoped to fly in yesterday, which is based in Burnet, Texas, or the North American B-25 Mitchell located here in San Antonio, there were not all that many aircraft to actually see in Midland.  But I was thrilled to the core to find one of them was a Russian Polikarpov I 16.  As a youth, I used to make model airplanes – none to well, I must admit – and I loved the diminutive little plane, which, to my eyes, looks remarkably like the Brewster Buffalo.  Both were cutting edge designs when introduced in the early 1930s but were significantly obsolete by the time World War Two started.  With little else available, young men bravely continued to fight the good fight in these machines, sometimes achieving remarkable success despite the odds stacked against them.</p>
<p>I never dreamed I’d ever actually see one up close and personal.  It was absolutely the peak moment of my 800 mile journey and would have made the entire trip worthwhile in and of itself.  I also visited the oil industry museum, which was not laid out so well for those who know nothing about the industry, in my opinion.  I’d have done better with a guide, I think.  It’ an impressive place for sure but a little overwhelming and incomprehensible.  Rich in detail but somehow lacking in drama, of what odds and difficulties the individuals involved had to face.</p>
<p>Also a little disappointing was the crater site west of Odessa, mainly because the original vast hole dug by a meteorite the size of a Suburban yet weighing a thousand tons is all but filled 50,000 years later.  I enjoyed rolling around Odessa, and got to visit a remarkably well restored railroad depot, originally located in a tiny town called Texon, now located about seven miles from the city, in someone’s backyard.  Acquired in an almost disintegrated state, the owner has poured money, time and effort into bringing it back to its former glory.</p>
<p>Midland is the more impressive of the two cities which are maybe fifteen miles apart by interstate.  The smell of hydrocarbons, or money, is quite pervasive wherever you go.  I’m certainly glad I finally took the time to go there but, a bit like Big Bend, I’m not itching to go back any time soon.  Bleak landscapes don’t work for me.  I couldn’t stand to live in a place where if I traveled fifty miles I’d still essentially be in the same place.</p>
<p>I came back via lesser roads, again wonderfully empty of other vehicles, aiming first for Ozona and then the Caverns of Sonora Located off of IH 10 some two hundred miles west of San Antonio, this natural wonder is most definitely worth a visit.  The tour lasts just under two hours.  It was a nice finish to a trip that seemed, to quote Joni Mitchell, to be all about the land and the sky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/road-trip-to-midland-and-odessa-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Relief coming for Eckhert at Bandera!</title>
		<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/relief-coming-for-eckhert-at-bandera/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/relief-coming-for-eckhert-at-bandera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bandera Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City of San Antonio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intersection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Department of Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthemoveblog.com/?p=4241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
For commuters from the Medical Center to Bandera Rd., one of the worse bottlenecks is the intersection of Eckhert at Bandera.  While there are dual left turn lanes for traffic headed toward the Medical Center from southbound Bandera, there is only a single right turn lane for traffic coming from the Medical Center to northbound Bandera.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4243" title="Echkert at Bandera" src="http://www.onthemoveblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Clipboard01.jpg" alt="Echkert at Bandera" width="499" height="306" /></p>
<p>For commuters from the Medical Center to Bandera Rd., one of the worse bottlenecks is the intersection of Eckhert at Bandera.  While there are dual left turn lanes for traffic headed <em><strong>toward</strong></em> the Medical Center from southbound Bandera, there is only a single right turn lane for traffic coming <strong><em>from</em></strong> the Medical Center to northbound Bandera.  This means that during the afternoon rush hour, that right turn lane backs-up considerably, sometimes all the way to Marshall High School, which itself also contributes to the problems when school&#8217;s in session.  To get around that, drivers cut through on neighboring streets, especially Woodchase, and some cut through the Carl&#8217;s Jr./Dickey&#8217;s parking lot.  A few bold drivers even make illegal right turns from the center lane, which is marked as straight or left turn only.  And I&#8217;m sure many drivers just avoid the area entirely.</p>
<p>To finally provide some relief, TxDOT and the City of San Antonio are working to install dual right turn lanes.  Some initial prep work to fix the corner curb and bring the curb cut to ADA compliance was completed a few weeks ago, and the &#8220;pork-chop&#8221; island that separates the right turn bay from the through lanes was removed earlier this week.  The City now has some traffic signal work to complete and then the restriping will be done.  There&#8217;s no official completion date as of now, but I would guess that it would be done by the time school starts-up again later this month or shortly thereafter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/relief-coming-for-eckhert-at-bandera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loop 1604/Braun update</title>
		<link>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/loop-1604braun-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/loop-1604braun-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 22:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Braun Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intersection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loop 1604]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super-street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Department of Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widening]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthemoveblog.com/?p=4216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of weeks ago, TxDOT completed the restriping of Loop 1604 to three lanes in each direction at Braun Rd.  This seemingly minor change has had a fairly dramatic effect on traffic.  From my own observations, typical peak period traffic jams in both directions have been significantly reduced.  For instance, southbound traffic used to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_4229" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4229" title="Braun/1604" src="http://www.onthemoveblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Clipboard02.jpg" alt="Future new westbound lane" width="500" height="311" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Future new westbound lane</p></div>
<p>A couple of weeks ago, TxDOT completed the restriping of Loop 1604 to three lanes in each direction at Braun Rd.  This seemingly minor change has had a fairly dramatic effect on traffic.  From my own observations, typical peak period traffic jams in both directions have been significantly reduced.  For instance, southbound traffic used to back-up nearly to Bandera Road during the evening rush hour, a distance of a mile or so.  But now it typically backs-up only half of that distance or even less.  I&#8217;ll be interested to see how it looks when school gets back into session, but for now, the improvement seems to have eased things quite a bit.  If you drive through this area regularly, post a comment and let me know your observations.</p>
<p>TxDOT is also planning at least one other improvement at that intersection, that being an additional lane on westbound Braun.  <span id="more-4216"></span>Right now, there are two westbound lanes: one is a left-only lane onto southbound Loop 1604, and the other is a through lane for Braun, which itself is now four lanes west of Loop 1604.  The problem is that during peak periods, traffic wanting to turn right onto northbound 1604 backs-up quite a way along Braun inside 1604, essentially blocking that right lane.  Folks who want to go through on westbound Braun then either have to wait in that line of mostly right-turning traffic, or they can go around in the left lane.  However, that left lane then becomes the left-only lane, so those folks wanting to go straight on Braun then have to shunt over to the right lane, which often causes conflicts with the people who waited in the right lane and unnecessarily disrupts traffic in the left-turn lane.  Additionally, vehicles turning left onto westbound Braun from northbound 1604 during peak periods (especially the school buses heading to the Leslie Rd. bus barn and the gravel trucks going to the nearby quarry) oftentime fill all of the available storage space, thus causing further delays for Braun through traffic.</p>
<p>To rectify this, the additional pavement available on the north side of Braun in the middle of 1604 will be made into a second through lane for westbound Braun traffic.  To safely accommodate that, a big chunk of the &#8220;pork-chop&#8221; island on the west side of the intersection will be removed and the area repaved, and an additional traffic signal head added (that&#8217;s actually already been done.)  See the diagram above to get a better idea of what I&#8217;m talking about.  There will also be some lane reconfigurations, although I haven&#8217;t seen the final plans for those yet.  However, I fully expect that the right lane from inside 1604 will be guided into the new right lane going through the 1604 intersections, and the left lane will then have the option of either entering the left-only lane or the center (existing) through lane.</p>
<p>These improvements are being done as the first phase of a package of improvements for Loop 1604 West over the next year that will include &#8220;super-street&#8221; intersections at New Gilbeau and Shaenfield and improvements at SH 151.  TxDOT is paying for the Braun Rd. intersection improvements and is doing the work themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onthemoveblog.com/2010/08/loop-1604braun-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
